TLC Air Pumping Up 🌪️ Downwards Strap ☁️ Non-Surgical Foreskin Restoration 💨 Journey of Salvation

Using air pressure to increase tension is an innovative idea! Wearing it every day has increased my restoration progress to help undo the desensitization and uncomfortably tight erections caused by having a healthy functional part of my body cut off without my consent when I was a child. Thank you for taking time to learn about this important gender equality issue:-) Case Against Involuntary Circumcision: To use the TLC Air you need some slack skin to put it on properly. If you are new to restoration then I recommend using a regular tugger first. It is important to use small circular band-aids to block air from the urethra. You can also add weights to this device for added tension while standing. Great Debate Circumcison: Please note that I bought this tugger myself the normal way and have no connection to the TLC Tugger site other than being a user of their restorers. TLC Air Tugger: The few case-control studies conducted among high-risk populations in Africa showed mixed results for circumcision as a risk factor for HIV. This study’s findings of no significant association between circumcision status and both HIV and STI contradict a number of studies, finding an association, conducted principally among African populations. However, one case-control study of a general population in Senegal also found a protective effect for lack of circumcision on HIV status. Studies of HIV or STI and circumcision status conducted in developed nations have yielded contradictory findings . Results from cross-sectional and cohort analyses of the project RESPECT study group, U.S. sexually transmitted disease clinic- based populations, showed slightly elevated risk for gonorrhea and syphilis among uncircumcised men, while there was essentially no risk difference found for chlamydial infection. Biological and mechanical mechanisms for increasing risk through microabrasion and the inherent infectiousness of the organisms may explain these findings. An analysis of data from the 2000 British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natasal), found an overall circumcision rate of 15.8% with no statistically significant difference in cumulative STI incidence by circumcision status . Although the British population has relatively low rates of circumcision, and the United States has moderately high rates, the British population’s circumcision rates likewise differ by ethnicity and country of origin. However, the associations were opposite those seen in the United States, with ethnic minority men in Britain more likely to report circumcision, as were men born outside the country. Considering “developed” countries as monolithic in terms of the role of circumcision in STI and HIV risk may be misleading. Nonetheless, there are similarities in sanitary conditions and relative access to healthcare. Differences in the various study findings may be due to uncontrolled confounding by religion, hygiene practices, restrictive social rules limiting partners outside of marriage, or differences in sexual practices and risk behaviors , rather than circumcision, per se. Basic health and sanitation conditions, as well as access to healthcare in the United States, are generally better and more comprehensive than in many African nations, which can greatly influence the role of circumcision, or lack thereof, in HIV transmission. In our study, while there were differences in the method of circumcision reporting between cases and controls, and differences in the rates of available circumcision status, no differences in demographics were seen after adjustment for participation location. Site-specific history-taking practices, and differences in clinical report forms account for reporting differences, not biases, with respect to patient characteristics. Some reporting bias could be present due to differences in clinician versus self-report data, although the direction of the bias is unclear [39]. The rates of circumcision found among the cases (85%) and controls (81%) are quite similar to the rates reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . In 1999, the AAP Task Force on Circumcision issued a policy statement recognizing the existing scientific evidence demonstrating medical benefits of neonatal circumcision, and yet concluded that the data remain insufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision; thus leaving the decision up to parents with the guidance of their pediatrician. This study adds weight to the evidence that lack of circumcision is not a risk factor for HIV in the general population of a developed country. Although known HIV risk factors such as inconsistent condom use, history of STI, multiple partners, and anal sex were found to be associated with HIV in this military population, there was no significant association with male circumcision.