Unmasking Fani Willis’ Red Flags That People Were Supposed to Ignore in Alarming Testimony

How does DA Fani Willis derail the lawyer’s questioning? What makes her answers unreliable, and what do they reveal about her agenda with her testimony? To answer these questions, this in-depth analysis looks at Willis’ diversion tactics and linguistic strategies such as ‘hedging language’ and ‘irrelevant details’. Willis is questioned about Nathan Wade, the prosecutor she’s accused of having had a relationship with before and during the time they were investigating the Trump 2020 Georgia election interference case. As an analysis, this video is made according to the terms of ‘fair use’. The video has an educational purpose, and you can use many of the principles and concepts to decode your own daily conversations. Support the work this channel is doing: