Against Method and For ’Pseudoscience’

Paul Feyerabend argued for ’Epistemological Anarchism,’ that in order to do truly good science, one can’t rule out alternative methods, ad hoc hypotheses, mythology, religion and wishful thinking. Using the example of Galileo, he shows how science’s greatest strides are made by deliberately being “unscientific“ in the way that court scientists tend to think nowadays. 1:29 Logical Positivism and The Demarcation Problem: