Under The Shadow Of Neoliberalism: False Flags, Immigration And Islamophobia: Part One

Under The Shadow Of Neoliberalism: False Flags, Immigration And Islamophobia: Part One Written by Murad Jazy edited by Hikaru Kitabayashi The ability to deduce stems from the realm of imagination, linking various elements together, kindling the imperceptible visible and transforming the unknown into the known. As such, thought arising from peace and security is as old as human history. Similarly, thought arising from the barbaric desire to impose one’s will on others with a blind force devoid of rationality and reason is also as old as human history. The only difference is that, with time, clothes and places change. Conducting a false-flag operation involves concealing the true source of responsibility and shifting blame to an innocent party in order to deceive others into believing that the innocent party is the perpetrator. For example, a government may conduct a false flag operation by staging an attack and blaming it on a different country to justify going to war. In this way, the true perpetrators remain hidden, and the innocent party is falsely accused. As deceit and decadence are always with us, in this age of instantaneous communication, let’s be especially careful of what is presented as evidence both by corporate-led Neocolonialists and by Christian-Judaic identifying Zionists and the Zionist like-minded subservient elites in the power and the opinion maker hierarchies in the Muslim world. Both groups are populated by abnormally large numbers of people who might be called “professional victims“, people who justify their self-perceived right to victimize others by presenting themselves as actually being the ones who, themselves, are victims. Islam, a religion followed by almost two billion people worldwide, literally means “Peace and Submission to Allah“. No Muslim is given the command to kill an innocent or to cause negativity. In words of James A. Michener, an American scholar and writer, “No other religion in history spread so rapidly as Islam. The West has widely believed that this surge of religion was made possible by the sword. But no modern scholar accepts this idea, and the Qur’an is explicit in the support of the freedom of conscience.“ The meaning of Islamophobia is “irrational fear of, or discrimination against Islam or against the people who practice Islam“. And, in the West, Islamophobia, unfortunately, dates back to its present form to the 10th century. The medieval Crusades then gave the Church’s blessing to the hatred of Islam. In recent times, however, the term became more prominent in the public sphere after the false flag 9/11 incident that seems to have been caused by intelligence agency drug cartel related individuals, which resulted in evil wars against Afghanistan and then Iraq. Interventions of the West in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan and turning a blind eye to atrocities against Kashmiris and Palestinians despite age long UN resolutions have not brought peace and progress to these regions, but pain and suffering and mass brutal killings at the hands of oppressors! Hence we see a migration to countries, which are currently perceived of as being safe from such military interventions and are relatively sound economically. Despite the fact that Islam has never and will never see itself in terms of skin tone, geographical location, gender, or linguistic affiliation, the media (especially, the mainstream western media) has played and is still playing a strong role in promoting Islamophobia. It stereotypes Muslims as always being individuals coming from the Middle East (West Asia) and North Africa, creating the perception that Islam is representative of the quaint, somehow dangerous, ethnic groups from Asia and Africa. In doing so, Western MSM (mainstream media) is, in fact, not promoting “freedom of speech“ but “freedom of hate and oppression”. Источник: Lord Of War