Salvador Sanchez vs Danny Lopez I (Highlights)

Uploaded for easier viewing - Mobile phones etc and for fight fans who perhaps don’t have the time to watch these great fights in full. Before facing Sanchez, Lopez had defended his championship eight times, in the process becoming one of the most popular boxers in America, his bouts featured regularly on live television. Everyone expected “Little Red” to notch successful defense number nine against the unknown Mexican, the contest Saturday afternoon fare on the CBS network. But it didn’t work out that way. Little did anyone know, but the 21-year-old Salvador Sanchez was not just another contender. A gifted counter-puncher, Sanchez had patience and maturity beyond his years, along with quick hands and a rock-solid chin. In round 13, the referee decided Lopez had to be saved from his own courage. After two clean rights staggered the champion yet again, he stepped between the fighters, halting the contest and raising the hand of Sanchez. One distinguished title reign ended and another began. Sanchez would go on to rule the featherweights with an extraordinary run, ten title defenses in fewer than 18 months, that included a rematch win over Lopez and victories against such formidable battlers as Ruben Castillo, Juan Laporte, Wilfredo Gomez and Azumah Nelson. Killed in a car accident in 1982, the title he took from Lopez was his until the day he died. Suffice to say, his reign lived up to its auspicious beginning. FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use“ for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use Fair use Additionally, the fair use defense to copyright infringement was codified for the first time in section 107 of the 1976 Act. Fair use was not a novel proposition in 1976, however, as federal courts had been using a common law form of the doctrine since the 1840s (an English version of fair use appeared much earlier). The Act codified this common law doctrine with little modification. Under section 107, the fair use of a copyrighted work is not copyright infringement, even if such use technically violates section 106. While fair use explicitly applies to use of copyrighted work for criticism, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research purposes, the defense is not limited to these areas. The Act gives four factors to be considered to determine whether a particular use is a fair use: the purpose and character of the use (commercial or educational, transformative or reproductive); the nature of the copyrighted work (fictional or factual, the degree of creativity); the amount and substantiality of the portion of the original work used; and the effect of the use upon the market (or potential market) for the original work.