Defining a “Knowingly False“ Statement in the Trump Indictment
Jack Smith’s January 6th case against Donald Trump is an indictment inside an indictment, a prosecutorial taco. On the outside, it has the shell of a conventional criminal conspiracy charge, one based on overt acts in states like Arizona, Michigan, and Georgia. Inside, it’s a radical authoritarian fantasy that would wildly expand current definitions of things like incitement and intent. Here, Racket’s Matt Taibbi discusses how Smith defines “Knowingly False“ in the indictment. For more, check out the story in Racket, “The Electric Kool-Aid Trump Indictment.“
1 view
489
135
4 weeks ago 00:16:00 1
Lancastrians Vs Yorkists | 1485 Historical Battle of Bosworth | Total War Battle
1 month ago 00:06:54 1
Osiris: The Murdered God Who Became Master of the Underworld
1 month ago 00:06:21 1
Oliver Stone’s version of American history
1 month ago 00:06:39 1
Mr. Mister “Broken Wings“ - Live at the Ritz
2 months ago 00:08:58 28
Incendies en Californie : l’économie part en fumée